The people of Shenandoah Park were
certainly not writers by my standards. They wrote letters to the park officials
about problems they were facing and if they could have assistance. The writing
abilities demonstrated by the residents are, for the most part, at a level
demonstrating very little education. The spelling and grammar (although some it
might be correct given the time period) is not well thought out and it would
appear as though the people write the same way they speak. If I was to consider
the residents writers simply because they wrote something I feel as though the
question “what is a writer” becomes a redundancy as the answer includes every
literate person. For my definition of what constitutes a writer I am going to
try and narrow down the amount of people who can claim writer as a title.
I believe the title of writer
should be given to those who write at some sort of professional level. What I
mean is people who: write for magazines/newspapers, authors of books, or any
other type of writing that reaches a relatively large audience. In addition to
quality I think quantity, as in the length of the writing and how often the
individual writes, is important in classifying someone as a writer. Ideally a
writer should be able to profit from his/her work. A writers revenue should be
looked at in order to rank writers on how well they write because success is
the goal most writers strive to achieve.
No comments:
Post a Comment