The relationship between print and digital media is rather
similar. For example, you can do some of the same things on the computer that
you can do writing on a piece of paper, and vice versa. I’d say that what
separates our decision-making regarding whether to use on over the other often
depends on the situation. At the end of the day, it essentially boils down to
preference. If either medium were to take over the other, it would obviously be
digital media, due to the significant advances in technology over the years we
have been fortunate enough to go through. However, preference is probably going
to keep that from happening for a long period of time. I could write this journal entry on a piece of
paper, but choose to do it on this computer because doing so is more time
efficient for me. That is my preference. The air traffic controller could
probably write his notes on Microsoft Word on a computer, but he chooses to still
scribble his notes on little pieces of paper. One might call it arrogance, but
an old phrase applies nicely to this situation: “If it ain’t broke, why fix it?”
That air traffic controller got to his position doing things the way he had
always been accustomed to. How can you blame him for sticking to what he’s most
comfortable with, or what he prefers? In regards to everyday writing, digital
media isn’t a better example of everyday writing than print, simply because
print usually requires the use of readily available resources and is not
mandated in any real sense. Computers stray more from the everyday writing because
so many things are already ‘set”. Having said that, I think that typing up your
own personal documents on Microsoft Word or writing e-mails to someone can be considered
an example of everyday writing. Technology has made immense strides as of late,
but print is just often times a more authentic and comfortable form for people
to use.
No comments:
Post a Comment